I have no idea what you are talking about. Yes 3 CP is expensive, that power is still fantastic. You get enough of them at least a couple of those situations are going to come up in any particular game. And then recognizing it when it does is a skill based thing. I like skill based things. There used to be this thing where Tau plasma was weaker, but safer.
- Post Comment!
- The Basketball Tree?
- TOP STORIES.
- Wie viel weniger ist mehr?: Lebenslust auf den Punkt gebracht (HERDER spektrum) (German Edition).
Now it is just weaker, period. I get that they came up with Ion. Which is basically plasma. Ok……make plasma do something else cool then. Yeah, it makes Rail and Sniper weapons really strong. Worth noting the Cyclic Ion Raker Overcharge got waaay better. That is basically never going to happen. GW likes to play jokes with their special character warlord traits. Read the description more carefully.click here
Top 20 Free Download Ebook Site.
So compared with e. Grand Strategist what you seem to be thinking of is the Warlord trait. So, Puretide is sort of a combination of both of them or, I think pretty much a straight relic version of the Ad Mech warlord trait: The IG relic that does it is generally accepted to be one of the best relics in the game and is probably too strong for what it costs. One reroll per game is equivalent to a free Command Reroll stratagem that can be used the same turn as the regular strat.
That means, at absolute worst, you break even with the relic. That doubles its effectiveness. I do apologise for rushing my reading of it. I would have liked it better if it was just a simple re-roll to be used for anything, rather than limiting it to only hitting, wounding, and damage. It is a small limitation, but not a particularly problematic one. Especially when leaks like this are happening, it really is important not to jump to conclusions. I personally think Firesight Marksmen are going to be auto-includes in every army. Why is the borkan sept strat a renamed version of the reroll strat?
The wording on the page is wrong, the codex states that you reroll 1 dice of a random shot count. Wonder if there are any changes to fortification rules?. Longstrike is listed as a HQ, but not a Named Character….
Even then ion wins at least for most statlines: Unfortunately its still weaker than the quad ion rifles on the bomber since Overcharged they are STR 8 2D now. I do recall the ion rifles on the bomber being particularly good. Wonder if it still has a multiple use bomb unlike every other bomber. The Razorshark is nominally an anti-ground platform, maybe it will finally be worth a damn at it. This should be known: Ion Cannons are strictly superior to Railguns on Hammerheads.
- A Walking Tour of Lexington, Virginia (Look Up, America!).
- El jardín de los tilos (Spanish Edition)!
- Free Audio Download Books Sites.?
- It’s a Great Stratagem, But Limited.
I ran a Monte Carlo simulation 1M runs each with the complete damage formula for 40k and the stats and effects for each weapon, accounting for randomization, hit and wound bonuses, and mortal wound chance. You can see the results here: There is absolutely no need to do a Monte Carlo simulation when the odds are simply and easily calculable. It gets more complicated than that, but the principles were the same. This is why I said I wanted to see your equations, not the results.
Hopefully it will elucidate on what I mean about averages skewing, and be clearer to read: I love you, thank you for doing these. Do you know if anyone has done then for the rest of the codex? This is my own code and inspired by a similar analysis of railguns vs laspreds in ATT. Maybe Kirby would be interested in the info. Yes please send it through and will be happy to post and credit; better info than just the spreadsheet!
I think those show quite clearly why you should always take the Seeker missiles on a Hammerhead — it rather lacks punch without them. The normal mathhammer is easy to do. I wanted more information, because averages get skewed very easily, especially with 1-shot, random damage weapons. Simple calculation-of-means mathhammer is impossible to fuck up anyway. Are you being contrarian for its own sake?
These graphs tell you how likely it is to get a certain amount of damage, as opposed to just the mean which is extremely vulnerable to outliers. IC have a higher average output than RG against every non-FW target and a much lesser chance of doing zero damage and wasting your entire shooting phase.
Stratagem | FanFiction
The math is easily calculable. No Ion cannons are better — we ran the math before in the tau weapons post but Railheads were taken as they were cheaper and the efficiency was just a little bit better. Now at roughly the same price, Ionheads thank you Longstrike probably remains the exception until the HBC for the Forgeworld variant gets updated.
Have you forgotten your own article on the subject? The solid shot was a LOT better against heavy vehicles T7 and better. But still, Railgun, solid shot surpassed them on the heavy end. But no, the Ion Cannon was better against some targets, not most. Now, maybe they are more balanced with some targets being better shot with Ion, others with Rail. I will, as always, run a mix longstrike having Rail Gun. Because doing it now I get 1. And less than D6 into either.
All numbers are ion vs rail. And ion is of course going to get better as target gets worse in toughness and sv or better invuls. And again, ion is going to be better going down in toughness. I appreciate this work but it makes my head hurt late at night, in bed, after drinking without the brackets.
But that just means the numbers are wrong: Thought they were strong before…. Tau Sept especially can make good use of the Rail, and the Ion has a surprisingly-good profile. The sept tactics all look to have some useful role at least. My Mech Tau from a rough draft came down by about pts from the leaked rules.
It is now looking something like this:. After seeing two thirds of your army locked in combat turn 1, I imagine that you would regret doing so. Yeah, the distance some units can move now is pretty disgusting.
And good luck vs GSC. Im new, so this might be a noob question, but within a single detachment can you have multiple units from different Septs? Yes, but that will almost always be a bad idea, since then you lose the Sept trait bonus. Note that you would still qualify for Relics and Stratagems, so it will sometimes be relevant. Slap a drone controller on a riptide hanging in the back with him and laugh all the way to the bank now. The only thing that would turn them into auto-include would be if volley fire worked on them lol. They do require two babysitters, though- a Drone Controller and a Firesight Marksman, which is the awkward part about them.
Exactly the thought, make a batallion using Sacae so you can use the very attractive markerlight strat for 2cp give at least one markerlight if not more without rolling to hit I think comparing them to gun drones is fairly valid for the crazy range they have. Having them baby sat by a riptide in the backyard works well, and they can in turn absorb the longer range high dmg fire power usually reserved for the riptide, and while they are more expensive and have less shots than a gun drone, they can literally always be in range of a target for the most part.
The part about needing some firesight marksmen is valid, but I feel they are super cheap elites that let you fill up a brigade easily without wasting points they are characters too so not easily targeted, and add another markerlight shot that no one can remove from your army with ease One of the biggest problems I see in alot of tau armies are that they use pathfinders or drones for markerlights.
Gives you very reliable shooting, access to the stratagem, and a bonus command point as well as another Commander to fit into the list; I suppose you could do something similar with Strike Teams for a few more points, though. Markerlights on Strike Teams are an easy choice so you always have the option, but until recently there was no reason to run Strikes, so…. Second picture is not blowing up! Vote Up 1 Vote Down.
March 9, Vote Up 5 Vote Down. March 9, 2: Vote Up 0 Vote Down. Vote Up -1 Vote Down. March 10, 2: March 10, Was that in an FAQ? Rail weapons are all -4, tho. Did you really need the ATS? March 9, 3: March 10, 4: Five cards from the Feminism, to the Antifeminism in America The documents in this paperback inform the reader's understanding and appreciation of the social and political context of opposition in which the advocates of women's rights labored from to Arranged in six parts by The aim is to line up 4 pieces which share the same attribute.
The problem is you can't choose which piece you're going to play -- your opponent chooses for you. Think of a word and try to stump your opponent. Includes one game board with erasable whiteboard, self-storing dry-erase marker and eraser. Opponents can use your buildings for their own purposes, and the final result should be one large magnificant house - casa grande Flip your wig for this fast and frenzied card game that will put your frizzy in a tizzy!
Race against your opponents to get rid of cards by matching all kinds of colourful hairstyles. Put together a pair of Pigtails. Combine a couple of Cornrows Produce, transform, gather resources, and don't forget to hinder your opponents! Artificium is a card-driven development game. Brett Dalton is a tough guy--hardened, angry, uncaring, and always ready to use his fists.
When the world hates you, you might Richard Dawkins and others yield to the temptation to imply that their opponents are men of straw.
Related Win an Argument: 40 Stratagems & Drills To Verbally Crush Any Opponent
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved